When George Siemens (2005) and Stephen Downes (2010) argue that connectivism as a learning theory enables people to utilize digital technology to support their learning, they are envisioning learners who are self-directed and actively engaging in evaluating information in order to discern most useful 'nodes' of information. Such a conceptualization of learner/learning shares some commonality with constructivists such as Bruner (1949) and Bandura (1977), in that both cognitivists and constructivists value agency and intrinsic motivation of the learner. Both cognitivists and connectivists emphasize an active involvement of learner and his/her interaction, although the purpose and resources deployed during interactions can be different.
Although both cognitivism and connectivism share some common features, they differ in some fundamental ways, such as in their views of a learner's mind, role of learner's experience/schema and the process of knowledge building. I have captured this below.
Bibliography:
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy - Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Retrieved from: https://d37djvu3ytnwxt.cloudfront.net/assets/courseware/v1/05624ff228a31c02f3d52d336b3c872e/asset- v1:USMx+LDT100x+2T2017_2+type@asset+block/Bandura1977PR.pdf
Downes, S. (2010). New technology supporting informal learning. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(1), 27-33.
Jerome Bruner and Leo Postman (1949). "On the Perception of Incongruity: A Paradigm." Journal of Personality, 18, 206-223
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.